Character and Adab Education in Indonesia, Turkey, and Japan: A Comparative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25217/igcj.v6i1.2973Keywords:
adab education, character, comparative studyAbstract
Today's education standards have changed due to science and technology advancements. Technological developments such as the internet caused students' character development in the Industrial Revolution 4.0 to be remarkably different from the earlier generation. This study was conducted to analyze the factors of successful learning based on Auguste Comte's Law which focuses on character and adab education. This study involved comparing the education systems of three countries, Indonesia, Turkey, and Japan, to ensure successful socialization in the education system of the millennial generation. Data were collected through the observational method applied using questionnaires, interviews, and documentation from Indonesian, Japanese, and Turkey schools. This was followed by applying an analytical approach using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) on the data obtained from the integration of questionnaire data processing and literature review. So that the method used in this study can be said to be a mixed method. Based on the study's results, obtained information and the suitability of the character education system between Indonesia, Japan, and Turkey. Character education that all parties observe, such as teachers, parents, and even school principals, can improve students' attitudes and good behavior and correlates with learning success in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0. The success factor of character education based on the integration of schools from Japan, Turkey, and Indonesia (Pesantren Tebuireng) was found to be "cooperation between teachers, parents, and evaluation of school principals and attitudes of respect for others." In addition, the results of research on character education can be associated with other attitudes such as tolerance, respect and speaking (not playing on cellphones), and acting politely.
References
10.4314/afrrev.v9i3.6
10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.156
10.3991/ijet.v7i1.1792
10.3390/rel9110367
10.1177/1365480219869425
Aoki, K. (2010). The Use of ICT and e-Learning in higher education in Japan. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 66(6), 868–872. Google Scholar
Aslan, A., & Zhu, C. (2015). Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions of ICT Integration in Teacher Education in Turkey. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3). Google Scholar
Ata Aktürk, A., Demircan, H. özlen, Şenyurt, E., & Çetin, M. (2017). Turkish early childhood education curriculum from the perspective of STEM education: A document analysis. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(4), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10210a
Bandura, A. (1985). Prentice-Hall series in social learning theory. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Google Scholar
10.3390/ijerph14050485
10.1080/00220620.2018.1426558
10.21125/edulearn.2017.0985
Cleary, T. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2017). Motivation and self-regulated learning influences on middle school mathematics achievement. School Psychology Review, 46(1), 88–107. Google Scholar
10.11114/jets.v3i6.1005
10.1007/s10648-015-9320-8
10.30870/jppi.v5i1.3469
10.1177/1052562917720710
EFE, H. A., & Hanas, K. (2021). Evaluation of STEM Education by Turkish Science Teachers. Dinamika Ilmu, 21(1), 237–249. http://doi.org/10.21093/di.v22i1.461
Farah, A. I. (2013). School Management: Characteristics of Effective Principal. International Journal of Advancemnet in Research & Technology, 2(10), 168–173. Google Scholar
10.1177/0888406416665448
10.1080/2331186X.2017.1332839
10.17478/jegys.596461
10.1177/0013161X11400186
Huda, S., Anggraini, L., Saputri, R., Syazali, M., Umam, R., Islam, U., & Radenintan, N. (2019). Learning Model to Improve The Ability to Understand Mathematical Concepts. PRISMA, 8(2), 173–181. Google Scholar
Huda, S., Muawanah, Munifah, Syazali, M., Palupi, E. K., Umam, R., & Tortop, H. S. (2020). Islamic education in supply chain system by prioritizing manners as a success factor of millennial generation on socializing. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(2), 853–863. Google Scholar
10.5815/ijieeb.2019.03.03
10.1088/1757-899X/650/1/012001
10.3390/rel11030110
10.17478/jegys.471466
10.1007/s40299-018-0405-2
Li, Y., Rong, Y., Ahmad, U. M., Wang, X., Zuo, J., & Mao, G. (2021). A comprehensive review on green buildings research: bibliometric analysis during 1998–2018. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12739-7
Martineau, H., & Harrison, F. (2000). The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte: Vol. III. London George Bell & Sons. Google Scholar
10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012081
10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.375
10.22215/timreview/1117
10.24042/ajpm.v10i2.5325
10.24042/tadris.v4i2.4893
10.31219/osf.io/4j6ur
Nzoka, J. T., & Orodho, J. A. (2014). School Management and Students ’ Academic Performance : How Effective are Strategies being Employed by School Managers in Secondary Schools in Embu. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(9), 86–99. Google Scholar
Ocak, G., & Yamaç, A. (2013). Examination of the relationships between fifth graders’ self-regulated learning strategies, motivational beliefs, attitudes, and achievement. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(1), 380–387. Google Scholar
Ozsoy, Y. (2019). A General View to the Academic Journals in the Field of Gifted Education in Turkey. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 6(1), 40–53. Google Scholar
10.15294/jpii.v8i1.15728
10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Duncan, T., & Mckeachie, W. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Google Scholar
Pressley, M., & McCormick, C. B. (1995). Advanced educational psychology for educators, researchers, and policymakers. HarperCollins College Publishers. Google Scholar
10.21831/jrpm.v5i1.13269
10.17478/jegys.548350
10.24042/ee-jtbi.v12i1.4430
10.1016/j.lindif.2018.05.018
10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.753
10.3390/rel9110335
10.37729/scripta.v7i2.830
10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.379
10.1080/23265507.2017.1354313
Sinaga, P., Kaniawati, I., & Setiawan, A. (2017). Improving secondary school students’ scientific literacy ability through the design of better science textbooks. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(4), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10215a
10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.240
10.33650/edureligia.v1i2.46
Thai, H. Van, Thi, L., & Anh, K. (2017). The 4.0 Industrial Revolution Affecting Higher Education Organizations’ Operation in Vietnam. International Journal of Management Technology, 4(2), 1–12. Google Scholar
10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.003
Wilson, M. (2019). Rendering Sociology. On the Utopian Positivism of Harriet Martineau and the ‘Mumbo Jumbo Club.’ Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas, 8(16), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.13135/2280-8574/3311
10.15700/saje.v37n2a1378
Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: where metacognition and motivation intersect. In Handbook of Metacognition in Education, 299–315. Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Syamsul Huda, Nilawati Tadjuddin, Ahmad Sholihuddin, Korhan Cengiz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
